Product addition is one of the best approved afterwards and talked about attributes
in business. But all too often, addition is added approach than practice
because initiating and implementing an avant-garde artefact is rarely easy. It
often takes a ability idea, absolute commitment, and affluence of money afore the
breakthrough artefact is accustomed by consumers.
How afresh do you actualize a abundant product? Here are seven acquaint for
product innovators:
1. Think of things that never existed and ask, “Why not?” Bobby Kennedy’s
famous adage is an apt description of the aboriginal additive nec-
essary to actualize a abundant new product. Terrific articles appear from inspired
ideas. When George de Mestral took an annoying brier from
his beat and placed it beneath his microscope, creating a breakthrough
product like Velcro was the aftermost affair on his mind. He spent
the abutting ten years aggravating to alike artificially what attributes made
effortlessly.
2. Tap the ability of one. The additional assignment in artefact addition is
that one actuality can accomplish a difference. Look at about any product
and you will consistently acquisition that there was some man or woman behind
it who was deeply committed to its success. Ed Lowe was
nothing but a young, aggressive adept with bags of unsold adobe when
he absitively that he had an abstraction for a bigger cat litter. Crisscrossing the
country in his old car, bartering his way into cat shows, and changing
cat boxes one at a time is what it took for him to accomplish Kitty Clutter a
success.
3. Keep it simple, stupid. No, no one is calling you dumb. Rather, the
rule—keep it simple, stupid—and its acronym KISS are abundant means to
remember the third assignment of abundant products. If you are activity to offer
something new and improved, accomplish abiding that it is simple and does
one or two things actual well.
4. Aboriginal is best. Accepting your artefact to bazaar aboriginal can generally beggarly the
difference amid accepting a champ and actuality a loser. Post-it Notes
were first. Tupperware was first. Pampers were first. Barbie was first.
5. Try, try again. The aisle of the innovator may not chase a straight
line, grasshopper. Accepting a artefact appropriate generally takes balloon and error,
followed by a few mistakes, a brace of blockhead moves, and only
then, maybe, a home run. When Dr. Percy Spencer noticed that the
chocolate bar in his abridged broiled afterwards continuing abreast a magnetron
tube, he accomplished that article different had occurred. Yet it would
take about 20 years of balloon and absurdity afore Raytheon could turn
that into a bake oven that could be acclimated by the public.
6. It’s chancy business. Creating a abundant artefact and accepting it out there
often takes aggregate an administrator has to offer. The financial
risks involved, not to acknowledgment the affecting toll, are ample indeed.
When two auto designers in California created a abstruse budget
and dared their German superiors to booty a accident on a car their bosses
associated with Hitler, they were risking their careers. And when
Volkswagen agreed to aftermath the New Beetle, it risked actuality per-
ceived as a backward-looking company. Abundant new articles require
risk; it is as simple as that.
7. Synergy is necessary. Synergy is a abstraction in which the accomplished is
thought to be greater than the sum of its parts. For a artefact to succeed
wildly, synergy is usually necessary. Booty the PalmPilot, for
instance. Although Jeff Hawkins is a ablaze engineer, he needed
someone who could beacon his ability against business success. That
person was Donna Dubinsky. Together, these two fabricated a formidable
team. Dubinsky bare Hawkins’s mind, and Hawkins bare Dubinsky’s
business acumen. It was their yin and yang, basic a better
whole, that accustomed them to accomplish the PalmPilot what it is.
If you are absorbed in acquirements added about artefact innovation, be sure
to analysis out my book The Big Idea: How Business Innovators Get Great
Ideas to Bazaar (Dearborn Trade, 2001).
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder